Thirteen locations were documented in the survey; most of them are dolmens and a few are possible dolmens (Figs. 1, 2). In addition, a Roman–Byzantine site was located where there are currently the remains of a Syrian village (twentieth century).
 
1. An open dolmen, without cover stones, a stone heap c. 7 m in diameter. An oak tree is growing in the dolmen (Fig. 3).
2. A closed dolmen whose cover stones are in situ, a stone heap c. 8 m in diameter.
3. An open dolmen with cover stones located along side it, a stone heap c. 7 m in diameter. An oak tree is growing in the dolmen.
4. A closed dolmen whose cover stones are in situ, a stone heap c. 10 m in diameter.
5. A large stone heap, dolmen?
6. A large stone heap that is probably a dolmen; it is apparent that part of it was plundered in the past. The depression in its center may be the location of the chamber.
7. An open dolmen, without cover stones, a stone heap c. 7 m in diameter. An oak tree is growing in the dolmen.
8. An open dolmen, without cover stones, a stone heap c. 9 m in diameter. An oak tree is growing in the dolmen.
9. A large stone heap at the top of the ridge, overlooking the Nahal Yehudiya channel to the north. This is probably a dolmen; the chamber is not visible on the surface level.
10. A dolmen (Fig. 4), a large stone heap rising c. 2 m above the surface level and overlooking Nahal Yehudiya. The chamber was plundered in the past.
11. A large dolmen (diam. c. 12 m, height c. 2.5 m) whose chamber was plundered in the past. It is situated on a terrace above the slope that descends to Nahal Yehudiya. A number of oak trees are growing in it.
12. A dolmen at the top of a slope that descends to Nahal Yehudiya. The burial chamber was plundered in the past. The cover stones are in situ (1.5 × 2.0 m), diameter c. 6 m.
13. A dolmen (diam. c. 5 m) at the top of a slope that descends to Nahal Yehudiya. The burial chamber was plundered in the past and the cover stones are along side it.
 
A series of walls made of roughly-hewn basalt stones located at the southwestern edge of the survey region (Fig. 5) belong to a twentieth-century Syrian village. A scatter of potsherds (Late Roman wares and Kefar Hananya vessels) at the site seems to indicate the presence of a settlement from the Roman–Byzantine period below the buildings of the village. It was not possible to conduct an accurate survey due to the thick vegetation in the area.