The sites included an elliptical dolmen (No. 1; length c. 8 m) and eleven circular dolmens that consisted of two small ones (Nos. 29, 72; diam. 2 and 4 m), five medium-sized (Nos. 3, 40, 43, 45, 48; diam. 4.4–9.0 m) and four large ones (Nos. 13, 16, 17, 69; diam. 10–12 m; Fig. 2). The remains of burial cells could be seen in the middle of the dolmens; a built burial cell (height 0.5 m), paved with flat stones, survived in Dolmen 69; at least two burial cells built of large stones were identified in Dolmen 16, which consisted of medium and large fieldstones. Eleven dolmens, whose identification was uncertain, were also surveyed: one elongated (No. 59; 4 × 8 m) and the rest circular (Nos. 7, 14, 18, 19, 21, 26, 33, 42, 57, 58; diam. 5.0–7.3 m). Building remains were discerned in the middle of Dolmen 18 and flat stones were observed in Dolmen 57. Forty-three stone clearance heaps were identified: one elliptical (No. 11; length 6 m), two of irregular shape (Nos. 5, 41), thirteen elongated (Nos. 8, 27, 31, 36, 38, 44, 49, 51, 56, 62, 73–75; length 6–10 m, width c. 3 m) and the rest circular (Nos. 2, 6, 9, 10, 15, 22, 23, 28, 32, 34, 37, 39, 47, 50, 52–55, 60, 61, 63–68, 78; diam. 2–10 m; Fig. 3).

Nine walls (width 0.5–1.0 m), mostly built of fieldstones, were documented in the survey area. Some were probably used to delineate cultivation plots (Nos. 12, 24, 30, 71; length 30–50 m, max. preserved height 0.5 m; Fig. 4). Others formed open rectangular and circular enclosures (No. 4—c. 19 × 19 m; No. 20—length of perimeter wall c. 50 m; No. 25—6 × 8 m; No. 46—at least 15 × 50 m; No. 76—length of perimeter wall c. 60 m); one of the enclosures (No. 46) was built of roughly hewn limestone. Other antiquities surveyed included a kind of passage (No. 77; length 22 m, width 5 m) that was hewn along the slope in an east–west direction; a cluster of four rock-hewn cupmarks (No. 70; Fig. 5), three of which were identical in size (diam. 0.6 m) and one was smaller (diam. 0.4 m); and a single quarry (No. 35; length 2 m).